The challenge? Train a large number of people (1500) spread
across the country in a new customer initiative. The challenge to the
challenge? The same as every project-cost! Face to face training would take
people out of their stores, thereby decreasing interaction with the customers
or resulting in only training half the number of employees reaching customers
because the other half was needed to ensure customer needs were met during the
training. Add to that the costs of renting a facility, paying the trainer, ensuring
all pre-work was completed so that the participants wouldn’t be lost with the
material to be covered in a short amount of time and it quickly snowballed into
a budgetary nightmare. But then the idea was posed to offer the training
virtually-allowing participants the ability to participate from their stores,
taking only a small part of the day to devote to learning and then immediately
applying the practices learned. In addition, travel expenses for the trainer,
rental fees for the facilities, and loss of revenue during training all became
non-issues. And in fact, adoption would rise as the training would be available
to a wider audience ensuring that all members of the organization would be
exposed to the learning opportunity and be able to implement new practices as a
team.
Overall, the project was wildly successful. Rather than
training the minimum of 1500, we trained well over 3000. The new initiatives in
customer service were adopted and implemented quickly, but more than that,
participants had an opportunity to learn and apply over and over again as the training
was completed over weeks rather than over hours. This lead to a greater feeling
of success amongst the participants and a renewed interest in training and
adapting as a whole.
When I think on the success of this project, there are many
factors that come into play. First and foremost, the process did not happen
overnight. There were long hours spent researching strategies and methods,
finding the best tools to deploy training and the right methods to ensure
understanding and application. In addition, time was spent learning about the
end user. The challenges faced on a daily basis that had to be overcome before
the new initiative could begin to even be practiced, let alone adopted. And of
course, stakeholders across the company had to be willing to take a risk on a
new endeavor, one that was not tried nor yet proven in the field. Communication
across the company lead to a large list of concerns and even negativity over
the changes being proposed in the delivery and seemingly “hands off” approach.
As a result, pilots were held. Test runs were completed in the short term, and lessons
learned were implemented into the larger plan. The pilots yielded valuable data
as to length of webinar, information shared, capabilities of the chosen
platform with varied numbers of participants. But the overall deciding factor
was in the feedback from the participants, and the data showing the initiatives
were taking hold where they were being trained.
As with any project, we know that there remains a look in
the rearview mirror, seeing where we’ve been. With knowledge in hand
post-deployment, some of these issues come to light in ways that hadn’t before.
For example, the lack of attention paid to accommodations for out of country
participants within the platform. Another challenge was that while business is
conducted the same way across the system, there are certain societal constructs
and cultural practices that are incompatible with the system as a whole. With
hindsight, we can see that adjustments could have been made to ensure the training
was applicable to all parties at all times and in all ways by setting up
regional opportunities for training. Another issue was long term adoption. Over
the course of the five weeks of training we saw great results, but within
twenty or so weeks post training, those results were tapering quickly. Follow
ups to reinforce practices and to correct errors within the processes would
have been valuable adds to ensure long term success.
As we prepare for another virtual training deployment, all
of these factors and more have been considered in the process. However, I am
quite certain that post-project we will still be able to identify growth
opportunities and ways to improve upon the project. In fact, I hope we never
stop looking for ways to improve and identifying new solutions and adaptations
to make learning and training more accessible to wider audiences.
Melissa,
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned "In addition, time was spent learning about the end user" underscoring that as one of the factors that contributed to the success of your project. This is keeping with good practices of a project manager which is to understand culture of either the organizations and or members of the organization which will allow you to make inform decisions in your planning. At the end of the day, they are the key stakeholders in an educational project and it is them (the learner) you need to connect with. You later went to speak to the impact of societal constraints which negatively impacted your project which I would couple with knowing your organization's culture and the persons there in. I had a similar issue when it comes to not having the needed resources to complete tasks, which I took for granted that would be available.
Hi Melissa,
ReplyDeleteI have so many questions! :) I wish we could have coffee and talk about all the details, as you've really peaked my interest with this 'wildly successful' project. I'll just pick a few questions for now though: were you the ID or the PM on this project? What was the timeframe you were working with? What delivery format/s did you decide to go with?
I ask because I work for a national financial organization with over 12,000 employees across the US. EVERYTHING we do is virtual, lol. We use a mix of asynchronous online courses, webinars, teleconferencing, with the only non-virtual training being in-branch coaching (which is one-on-one). I would say that our people are probably over-run with the amount of virtual training they are required to do. We are now always so happy when we get a chance to create a course that people can actually attend.
Melissa,
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this example and the challenges you encountered, along with the success! You talked about the pilots being valuable and using the data to find that the instructional information was being retained by learners. You stated that 20+ weeks post-training showed a decline in the retention rate of the training. I am interested in what ideas you/your team come up with to improve this decline of retaining information long-term in future training/instructions?
Melissa,
ReplyDeleteThose are the bast kind of project. The ones that make you remember why you love this field. I had one much like that but instructor lead, that just came together beyond expectations. I think the combination of those that work like this one and those that fail hone our skills. If every project failed, well we would not be here, but if every one succeeded what would we learn?
Melissa,
ReplyDeleteThat is wonderful that the project was a success. You mentioned the business is conducted the same throughout the system even with variations in cultural or societal practices. How did the system differentiate for these factors? Were trainers selected for these different demographics to support trainees? I think it is important you added the process was not achieved overnight, and this is something many people overlook. A great training or program will not be implemented and successful after one meeting, and it takes many great minds to create an effective program. Since there were so many people involved did you find communication to be the biggest hurdle to overcome?
-Nicole